Do the Standard's caption writers actually look at the photos they are captioning?
Showing posts with label People. Show all posts
Showing posts with label People. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 20, 2022
Thursday, March 24, 2022
Blood Ties
Labels:
Bad Taste,
Contradictions,
Death,
Evil,
Humour/Satire,
Irony,
Patriotism,
People,
Politics
Saturday, March 06, 2021
Quack Doctor
No one can deny that HKU professor of microbiology Yuen Kwok-yung has made a major contribution to Hong Kong';s fight against the Covid-19 virus - but really, what's with the duck's beak mask?
P.S. The heading of this post refers only to the duckie character of Dr Yuen's mask, and is in no way questioning his credentials. If I had wanted to write about dubious doctorates, I would have headed the post "Quat Doctor".
Labels:
Health,
Hong Kong,
Humour/Satire,
People,
Questions
Tuesday, October 06, 2020
Look Back in Danger
Four decades in Hong Kong have given me a great admiratiuon for the Hong Kong people (if not, alas, for those who govern them). Yet despite their hard work, intelligence, and dedication to principle, one quality is curiously lacking - they seem to be totally unaware that vehicles can travel backwards as well as forward. Any driver in Hong Kong trying to manoeuvre into or out of a tight parking spot can be sure that the second they start reversing, some idiot pedestrian will walk across their path a few inches behind them, seemingly blithely unaware that they are actually moving. I'm not sure what accounts for this blind spot - posasibly the fact that many Hongkongers lack driving experience - but you can be sure that if one of these people who put themselves in harm's way actually suffered an injury, they would immediately blame the poor driver for it and not their own lack of caution.
Mind how you go.
Labels:
Driving,
Explanations,
Hong Kong,
Humour/Satire,
People,
Stupidity,
Travel
Monday, September 28, 2020
We are the people our government warned us against
Labels:
Hong Kong,
Humour/Satire,
Irony,
Law,
Patriotism,
People,
Politics,
Quotes
Tuesday, September 15, 2020
Nasal Intrusion

Though the government will no doubt proclaim its mass community testing programme for Covid-19 a magnificent triumph, I leave it to others to comment on whether a turnout of 1.7 million against a projected 5 million, with only a handful of positive test results, really qualifies as a success.
What I do wonder is whether any of the numerous test subjects pictured in the constant stream of propaganda pushing the scheme have given permisision for their depiction in this situation. Surely one time you are entitled to expect a degree of privacy is when undergoing an uncomfortable and unsightly medical procedure probing one's oral cavities?
Given this, I wonder how it is that Chief Executive Carrie Lam (or her body double; it's impossible to tell from this angle) managed to get her own test photographed from behind?

Labels:
Advertising,
Bad Taste,
Health,
Hong Kong,
Humour/Satire,
People,
Politics,
Questions
Saturday, June 20, 2020
Lessons in Stupidity
Labels:
Education,
Humour/Satire,
People,
Politics,
Stupidity
Monday, May 25, 2020
Big bad wolf in Granny's clothing
Former Hong Kong Justice Secretary Elsie Leung may look like a harmless grandma, but make no mistake, when future historians compile a Roll of Dishonour of those who have connived to enslave Hong Kong, her name will be high on the list alongside those of CY Leung and Maria Tam. Her claim yesterday that for a mainland security agency to operate in Hong Kong under China's new national security law for the SAR is no more worrying than it is for MI5 and MI6 to operate in the UK or the CIA in the USA is totally disingenuous. Leung may pretend to be stupid, but she knows full well that those agencies are accountable to the elected governments of their countries, while whatever agency operates in Hong Kong will be accountable only to a brutal dictatorship that holds millions of its own citizens in captivity without trial, and is determined to stamp out the freedoms it once promised to Hong Kong. Who is she trying to fool?
Friday, May 08, 2020
Tales of Terror
I turned on the TV the other morning, and within the space of a few minutes was confronted by all three of these terrifying characters. I really don't think they should transmit horror shows so early in the day when impressionable children may be watching.
Saturday, February 01, 2020
Why it happened
Saturday, January 18, 2020
Uninformed
Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam denies observing any police brutality during the past seven months of protest. Strange - you'd think with her massive salary, she could afford to own a television.
Meanwhile in the UK, Home Secretary Priti Patel denies seeing any evidence that Meghan Markle has faced racism from the British press. Also strange - surely a Cabinet Minister should read the newspapers?
Meanwhile in the UK, Home Secretary Priti Patel denies seeing any evidence that Meghan Markle has faced racism from the British press. Also strange - surely a Cabinet Minister should read the newspapers?
Thursday, December 12, 2019
Lawyers speak a different language
So is that a yes or a no? Our devious Justice Secretary isn't saying.
Dark Kingdom
Labels:
Bad Taste,
Brexidiocy,
History,
Humour/Satire,
Mayhem,
People,
Politics
Saturday, November 30, 2019
All that education and still stupid as sh*t
You have to wonder what is wrong with Chief Executive Carrie Lam. She's supposed to be highly intelligent - invariably number one in class, head girl at school, educated at top universities in Hong Kong and the UK, years of experience as a senior civil servant - yet it is clear she is as out of her depth now as Bob Dylan's Mr Jones.. The two biggest mass protests ever in Hong Kong, and she doesn't get the message. Six months of violent clashes, and she doesn't get the message. Now the biggest electoral drubbing in history for the pro-government parties, and she still doesn't get the message. Public opinion polls show her popularity rating at unprecedented lows, and that more than half of Hongkongers have zero trust in the police, and - need I repeat myself?
Hong Kong voted massively for change, yet all Lam continues to deliver is hand-wringing, platitudes and empty promises. For all her talk of listening humbly to the people, I think the problem is that humility is not in her nature. Southern District Councillor Paul Zimmerman's analysis seems spot on: instead of thinking "the people have spoken; I must respond", her attitude is "the people are attacking me; I must fight back". That does not bode well for Hong Kong's future.
Hong Kong voted massively for change, yet all Lam continues to deliver is hand-wringing, platitudes and empty promises. For all her talk of listening humbly to the people, I think the problem is that humility is not in her nature. Southern District Councillor Paul Zimmerman's analysis seems spot on: instead of thinking "the people have spoken; I must respond", her attitude is "the people are attacking me; I must fight back". That does not bode well for Hong Kong's future.
Labels:
Education,
Explanations,
Hong Kong,
Humour/Satire,
People,
Politics,
Stupidity
Saturday, November 23, 2019
The Lesser of Two Goods
Tomorrow's District Council elections are being framed in some quarters as a gargantuan battle between the resurgent forces of democracy and the mighty Beijing United Front electoral machine, a chance to strike a blow against the powerful empire that is crushing Hong Kong. Well, guess what, most District Council work is pretty humdrum stuff, more concerned with where rubbish bins and bus stops should be located than with the higher scheme of things. Nevertheless, after months of violent protest the election does present a rare opportunity to raise one's voice peacefully against the DAB juggernaut and to demonstrate the Hong Kong government's near-total lack of support (as an aside, there is no silent majority supporting this clueless government - in fact, any politician anywhere who claims the backing of a silent majority usually lacks much real support).
What may surprise my regular readers is that I have decided, after much reflection, not to vote for the candidate of the democracy movement in my district. Our constituency is largely rural, with a mix of traditional villages and upmarket estates, and has been represented for two terms now by a local man who is popular in the area. As an indigenous villager, he has some connections with the Heung Yee Kuk, but his political stance is genuinely independent. More importantly, he has done a good job for the district - I base this not just on his glossy election brochure listing the many projects he has been involvesd in (as Mary Melville's comments here point out, some candidates will claim credit for just about anything that happens in their district, or even in neighbouring districts), but on experience. My wife worked with him on a successful campaign against an unsuitable proposed development in the district, and has observed at first hand the effort he puts in.
Nothing against the "official" democracy candidate, who comes with the backing of various well-known pro-democracy figures, but he has no track record here (and his election leaflet misspells the constituency name; not a great confidence-booster!) And ultimately, why do we want a more democratic system? Not to make great gestures with our votes, but to select candidates who are dedicated to their job, care about their constituency, and who listen to and are responsive to their voters' needs and wishes. We have that already in our constituency, which is why the incumbent will be getting my vote again. Tell me if I'm wrong.
And by the way, don't worry if your ballot paper has a corner snipped off - it's not damaged, just a new feature to help the blind.
What may surprise my regular readers is that I have decided, after much reflection, not to vote for the candidate of the democracy movement in my district. Our constituency is largely rural, with a mix of traditional villages and upmarket estates, and has been represented for two terms now by a local man who is popular in the area. As an indigenous villager, he has some connections with the Heung Yee Kuk, but his political stance is genuinely independent. More importantly, he has done a good job for the district - I base this not just on his glossy election brochure listing the many projects he has been involvesd in (as Mary Melville's comments here point out, some candidates will claim credit for just about anything that happens in their district, or even in neighbouring districts), but on experience. My wife worked with him on a successful campaign against an unsuitable proposed development in the district, and has observed at first hand the effort he puts in.
Nothing against the "official" democracy candidate, who comes with the backing of various well-known pro-democracy figures, but he has no track record here (and his election leaflet misspells the constituency name; not a great confidence-booster!) And ultimately, why do we want a more democratic system? Not to make great gestures with our votes, but to select candidates who are dedicated to their job, care about their constituency, and who listen to and are responsive to their voters' needs and wishes. We have that already in our constituency, which is why the incumbent will be getting my vote again. Tell me if I'm wrong.
And by the way, don't worry if your ballot paper has a corner snipped off - it's not damaged, just a new feature to help the blind.
Thursday, November 21, 2019
Lord, what fools these ministers be!
This is Hong Kong's "Secretary for Justice" - who decided that this would be a good time, in the middle of months of violent clashes on the streets of Hong Kong, to fly to London (presumably at the taxpayers' expense) to promote the territory as a centre for dispute resolution. Truly, these people make satirists redundant.
Wednesday, October 30, 2019
A Man of His Word?
I'd reather be dead in a ditch than still in the EU after October 31st, declared Boris Johnson. Well, those millions of us Brits who value our rights as European citizens can be glad that we will not lose them for at least a while longer, but sadly Boris's claim seems to be, as Jeremy Corbyn has pointed out, another broken promise.
Labels:
Bad Taste,
Brexidiocy,
Death,
Humour/Satire,
People,
Politics,
Quotes
Sunday, September 08, 2019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


















