- Hong Kong is already grossly overpopulated and doesn't have room for more people.
- A growing population will need more green space for relaxation and recreation, not less, so we should stop eating away at it for other purposes.
- Pushing through the government's blatantly undemocratic political reform proposal is more likely to exacerbate discontent in Hong Kong than to eliminate it.
- With more and more people and a finite supply of land, the village house policy is clearly unsustainable (apart from being a scam whereby "New Territories villagers" who don't even live in Hong Kong any more come back to grab their piece of subsidised land).
- There is a limit to the number of tourists Hong Kong can accept without straining its infrastructure to breaking point.
- The bridge to Macau will never be economically viable or environmentally sensible.
- If you're going to build a high speed railway between two cities (not a bad ideas in itself), the termini should be at major transport intersections to facilitate onward travel, not stuck in the middle of nowhere.
- As one of the richest cities in the world (in terms of GDP per capita), Hong Kong could easily afford to eliminate poverty and give all its citizens a decent standard of living - there is absolutely no reason why 80-year-old ladies should be reduced to scavenging cardboard boxes to survive.
- When small businesses complain that they can't afford to give their workers a better deal, it's not because wages are too high, but a) because too much of their revenue goes to paying inflated commercial rents, and/or b) they're greedy (pick one or both).
- When the mainland insists on selling us more water than we need at a price much higher than other cities in China pay, it's time to look again at the economics of desalination, not just meekly accept whatever non-negotiable deal is on the table.
Wednesday, January 28, 2015
Overlooking the Obvious
Ten facts that should be obvious to any reasonably intelligent person here, but apparently not to the Hong Kong government:
Friday, January 16, 2015
What does CY Leung have in common with al-Qaeda terrorists?
...apart, that is, from them being unlikeable people with rigid inflexible minds intent on forcing their own narrow ideology down everyone else's throat?
Well, neither appears to have heard of the Streisand Effect.
Well, neither appears to have heard of the Streisand Effect.
Labels:
Advertising,
Bad Taste,
Books,
Censorship,
Evil,
Hong Kong,
Irony,
Media,
People,
Politics,
Questions,
Reading List,
Religion,
Stupidity
Monday, January 12, 2015
Je Suis Jimmy
"The
Chinese side resolutely opposes terrorism in all manifestations" announced the Chinese government after the Charlie Hebdo massacre. Let's see what they have to say about this case.
Wednesday, January 07, 2015
New Year, New Lies
A Happy New Year to my readers! Though I doubt if anyone in Hong Kong is too optimistic about 2015 when the government starts the new year as it ends the old one, by talking crap.
After recounting in tedious detail the events of the past few months since its last dishonest report to its Beijing overlords, the Government somehow concludes its new report by saying "It is the common aspiration of the Central Authorities, the HKSAR Government, and the people of Hong Kong to implement universal suffrage for the CE election in 2017 in Hong Kong as scheduled and strictly in accordance with the Basic Law and the relevant Interpretation and Decisions of the NPCSC".
Well, they were doing all right up to "as scheduled", but the last bit basically ignores everything that brought about the entire umbrella movement protests. The problem is that the NPCSC's rulings on the political reform process, far from being "strictly in accordance with the Basic Law", completely override the essence of the Basic Law's provision (Article 26) that "Permanent residents of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall
have the right to vote and the right to stand for election in
accordance with law.", while its decision that the nominating committee must follow the framework of the previous Election Committee contradicts the requirement (Article 45) for it to be "broadly representative".
This is of course a Catch-22 situation. When the NPCSC violates the Basic Law, who can one appeal to? Er, the body entrusted with interpreting the Basic Law - the NPCSC...
This is of course a Catch-22 situation. When the NPCSC violates the Basic Law, who can one appeal to? Er, the body entrusted with interpreting the Basic Law - the NPCSC...
Still, the report should be easy to fix. All the government needs to do is amend "the people of Hong Kong" in the sentence above to "those members of the Hong Kong public who consider sucking up to the Chinese Communist Party to be more important than achieving genuine democracy", and everything will be hunky dory - except for everyone else in Hong Kong.
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)